When E-2 may deserve closer review
The investor has treaty nationality, is investing personal or controlled funds, will own and direct the U.S. enterprise, and can document a real operating business.
Pathway comparison
E-2 and L-1A can both support business activity in the United States, but they are built on different facts. E-2 centers on treaty nationality and a substantial at-risk investment. L-1A centers on a qualifying relationship between foreign and U.S. entities and the transfer of an eligible executive or manager.
Treaty-country investor directing and developing a U.S. enterprise
Qualifying organization transferring an executive or manager to a related U.S. entity
Principal applicant must hold qualifying treaty nationality
No treaty-country nationality requirement
Treaty ownership and investor control are central
Foreign and U.S. entities need a qualifying corporate relationship
Ability to direct and develop the invested enterprise
Qualifying employment abroad and proposed executive or managerial U.S. role
Substantial capital must be committed and at risk in a real enterprise
U.S. operation must support the transfer; new-office cases require a credible growth and staffing plan
Can the investment, ownership, funds, enterprise, and investor role be documented?
Can the company relationship, overseas employment, role, premises, and U.S. growth plan be documented?
The investor has treaty nationality, is investing personal or controlled funds, will own and direct the U.S. enterprise, and can document a real operating business.
An established foreign company is expanding or already operating in the United States and wants to transfer a qualifying executive or manager.
Ownership documents, entity relationships, job duties, capitalization, staffing, premises, and operating evidence should be designed as one consistent business and immigration record.